<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Season Sweeps Update #5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socal-ld.net/2010/02/24/season-sweeps-update-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socal-ld.net/2010/02/24/season-sweeps-update-5/</link>
	<description>Southern California&#039;s NFA-LD site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 20:45:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.socal-ld.net/2010/02/24/season-sweeps-update-5/comment-page-1/#comment-11453</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socal-ld.net/?p=1434#comment-11453</guid>
		<description>Cosign. Would have been nice for LDers to get some speaker recognition at Fall Champs and it&#039;d be unfortunate to see those deserving individuals at Spring Champs miss out again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cosign. Would have been nice for LDers to get some speaker recognition at Fall Champs and it&#8217;d be unfortunate to see those deserving individuals at Spring Champs miss out again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nerdy db8r</title>
		<link>http://www.socal-ld.net/2010/02/24/season-sweeps-update-5/comment-page-1/#comment-11452</link>
		<dc:creator>nerdy db8r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socal-ld.net/?p=1434#comment-11452</guid>
		<description>Indeed, Gratz to the Bible Institute of Los Angeles!

This award system was a great idea and I look forward to hearing from Nick, and others, on their suggestions to the system.  

I spent 10 minutes trying to figure out where the first post was, but now that I have you said teams would receive awards in the mail.  As an LDer I have begun to notice the differences in award ceremonies between LD and Parli.  I have been trying to figure out why LD doesn&#039;t get speaker awards at most tournaments.  If we have to sit through them for Parli why can&#039;t we spend an extra 5 minutes to do them for LD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, Gratz to the Bible Institute of Los Angeles!</p>
<p>This award system was a great idea and I look forward to hearing from Nick, and others, on their suggestions to the system.  </p>
<p>I spent 10 minutes trying to figure out where the first post was, but now that I have you said teams would receive awards in the mail.  As an LDer I have begun to notice the differences in award ceremonies between LD and Parli.  I have been trying to figure out why LD doesn&#8217;t get speaker awards at most tournaments.  If we have to sit through them for Parli why can&#8217;t we spend an extra 5 minutes to do them for LD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.socal-ld.net/2010/02/24/season-sweeps-update-5/comment-page-1/#comment-11451</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socal-ld.net/?p=1434#comment-11451</guid>
		<description>Oh noez! I&#039;m behind! But that&#039;ll provide me an extra incentive to do well this weekend. 4-0 and a couple elim ballots should be enough to push me ahead. ;) 

Tremendous job by Biola to claim the top ranking, by the way. To maintain that high of a winning percentage with such a large sample size is astonishing. Hopefully we&#039;ll see more debaters move up to open next year to add some spice to the competition.

Finally, I&#039;ve spent a little bit of time thinking about the awards system and I&#039;ve come up with three potential improvements for next year. (Pre-empt: they don&#039;t relate to the aforementioned novice/JV/senior split). Once this year&#039;s awards are handed out using the current system, I think that discussion can begin in earnest. I recall someone recommended a committee to formalize changes to the award - I would be happy to be a student representative if there is interest in that.

Good luck to everyone this weekend!

- Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh noez! I&#8217;m behind! But that&#8217;ll provide me an extra incentive to do well this weekend. 4-0 and a couple elim ballots should be enough to push me ahead. <img src='http://www.socal-ld.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Tremendous job by Biola to claim the top ranking, by the way. To maintain that high of a winning percentage with such a large sample size is astonishing. Hopefully we&#8217;ll see more debaters move up to open next year to add some spice to the competition.</p>
<p>Finally, I&#8217;ve spent a little bit of time thinking about the awards system and I&#8217;ve come up with three potential improvements for next year. (Pre-empt: they don&#8217;t relate to the aforementioned novice/JV/senior split). Once this year&#8217;s awards are handed out using the current system, I think that discussion can begin in earnest. I recall someone recommended a committee to formalize changes to the award &#8211; I would be happy to be a student representative if there is interest in that.</p>
<p>Good luck to everyone this weekend!</p>
<p>- Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.253 seconds -->

