Sunset Cliffs – Open Field Report

The Sunset Cliffs Invitational, hosted by Point Loma Nazarene University in sunny San Diego is now just a week away. As of Sunday afternoon, there were 40 teams representing 14 schools from eight states. This is truly a phenomenal field – by far the largest and most competitive in Southern California this year. I’ll start the pre-Super Bowl festivities off with a little field report.

This tournament will feature four preliminary rounds breaking to octafinals – all 3-1 records should clear.

NFA-LD Entry List – Open:

NFA-LD Wiki team list:

There are 14 schools entered; however, five of them do not have wiki pages. Please, if you have any intel about what the missing schools are running, start a wiki page and post your knowledge to help better facilitate the preparation process as we move closer to next weekend.

The following schools have information on the wiki:

Azusa Pacific: http://nfacaselist.wikispaces.com/Azusa+Pacific+University

Creighton University: http://nfacaselist.wikispaces.com/CreightonUniversity

Point Loma: http://nfacaselist.wikispaces.com/Point+Loma

Rice University: http://nfacaselist.wikispaces.com/Rice

Truman State: http://nfacaselist.wikispaces.com/Truman+State

University of California, Los Angeles: http://nfacaselist.wikispaces.com/UCLA

University of Nevada, Reno: http://nfacaselist.wikispaces.com/UNR

University of the Pacific: http://nfacaselist.wikispaces.com/University+of+Pacific

US Air Force Academy: http://nfacaselist.wikispaces.com/USAFA

Western Kentucky: http://nfacaselist.wikispaces.com/Western+Kentucky

Field Analysis

This year’s field is pretty deep, and the race to elimination rounds will be cutthroat. I would expect the out-of-state teams to do well – UNR, USAFA, and WKU all field excellent debaters and should have not problem securing outround spots. University of Oregon is actually new to LD, I believe, so I have no idea how they might fare (although if their success in parli is any indication I wouldn’t underestimate them). I’m not as familiar with Truman or Rice, but it would be prudent to prepare for them regardless.

For in-state schools, University of the Pacific will be dangerous as always. Rumor has it that yours truly is an okay debater. I think my target audience is familiar with the local Socal schools for the most part, so you know who stands a good chance of breaking. (If not, you can always download the latest Season Sweeps to get a good picture).

Tournament Prep Advice:

With such a large field, preparation might seem rather daunting. But it’s doable if you put in time and effort. Here are some tips to help you prepare.

- It is impossible to adequately prepare a strategy for every conceivable argument. Instead, you should focus on prioritizing your work. You can speed up the process by delegating work among your teammates – if you don’t overlap on assignments, your squad can achieve optimal efficiency.

- Your affirmative should always be your top priority. Have answers prepared, inherency updated, topicality blocked out. I can’t stress this enough – the case is your fortress, and you do not want to be caught off-guard and end up with a few breaches in your proverbial stone walls.

- Focus on strengthen your generic positions next. Rifle through the wiki and find out what kind of specific link stories you need to cut. Prepare some generic counterplans that can solve most affirmatives with a net benefit. Make sure your topicality shells actually make sense. (And if you are still reading camp evidence, discard it. I’m serious. Do some original research for once.)

- Lastly, you can cut specific negative strategies to specific cases. Simply head over to the wiki, compile cites and/or plan texts, and start putting together evidence to counter these cases. This is extremely time-consuming, but it’s far better to have some juicy solvency takeout cards available than to have to muddle around with just generics and shoddy analytics every round. Also, let me emphasize something: LD is NOT PARLI. There is an evidentiary standard in policy-based formats and it drives me absolutely crazy when debaters choose to ignore it.

- For small teams of only one or two people, preparation is hard. You just need to work at it. I can empathize with you – I am UCLA’s only LD debater and thus I do 100% of the work. Of course, I also border on being obsessive-compulsive, so I will probably average about eight to ten hours a day cutting cards over the next week. (Note: only one part of that sentence was an exaggeration). Most of that effort will go unused, but the educational benefits that can be derived from doing all that research are phenomenal, and that’s not to mention the competitive edge that it gives you.

- Good luck, and have fun!

- Nick

Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader.

Comments

I will not lie, I was hoping you would take more people from IEs so it would be easier, but I guess I cannot complain to much, lol.
But seriously, good luck to everyone that’s rolling all in on LD. I gotta get my legs for AFA so I wish you all well!

First LD tournament I have missed this year and it makes me a little sad – my coach told me that I could do LD, but I wouldn’t want to receive a gift; right Nick?

go Air Force! And good luck everyone else :) I won’t be competing at this one (at least not in LD), but the USAFA babies should give you all some great competition.

all the preparation is wasted. opp strategy is always Topicality, procedurals, and counterplans. the debate doesn’t start until the 2nd speech.

at least thats what it seems like.

I heard that UO picked up in Junior finals, but I didn’t hear what happened in open… I know Will dropped sems so he could go win parli.
BTW – gratz to Will and Sarah for winning in Parli.

but seriously, who won open and who ran what?
(for what its worth, I was in sems/finals in IE’s so I couldn’t steal tags for the case wiki)

Oregon’s Matt Gander Wins a 3-0 over WKY

what was oregon running?
either side?

The two rounds I had against them, I hit National Park roads on the aff (remove the ban against constructing roads in national parks, key to forest management/preventing wildfires, warming impacts) and they were running a coercion K on the neg. Other people might have ran different stuff, I don’t know.

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)