(This joke was not meant to be offensive to all people in the service. I still love you Brandon!)

we actually try to do the killing and torturing off base. the bone-chilling screams of dissenters makes it hard to sleep, and that’s a safety issue with pilots, etc.

I am also sure that the report gets more specific, Danny mentioned that some of those quotations were from the executive summary… which is a summary, right, means it is short and to the point, cause that’s what summaries do, right?

I think this would work, or something like this…
Harms: We have shitty roads
California just released a report that says Californians lose 40 billion a year because of poor roads: from traffic, to accidents, to wear and destruction on the car

Plan: Build new roads that are like this______ (however they say i should be done in that file, I don’t want to read it right now)

Solvency: These new roads aren’t shitty
They are what we need so we don’t loose $40 billion, they will only loose $15 billion because people will still have accidents but they won’t have issues from bad roads.

Advantage 1: GW
Oh, by the way, these roads are K2 stop/slow/check Global Warming
GW isn’t good

Advantage 2: Poverty
PPL who save the most would be the impoverished
Poverty is shitty to be in

Sounds to me that it is topical. Roads are physical infrastructure.

Build roads, everywhere… doesn’t sound unrealistically vague to me. If there is a road that is not at (X) specification then we will make it that way. What more do you need/want?

tix – You may win timeframe. I will give you that; it will take us years to see the truly negative effects of GW. Probability and magnitude I think GW is on the side of this mini-aff. I don’t know anyone running politics that would outweigh GW on prob/mag… That is just from what I have seen, don’t hate on me because I haven’t seen YOUR tix before. Which is why you have the CP, right?

SCP – States CP FTL. Like, major FTL… bad FTL. Run states have no money/are bankrupt, States Elections (Louisiana has a major election coming up next year that this could play a huge role in), major solvency deficits, and the list goes on! Besides, who do you think will build the roads? States. Why? because the USFG only uses shovels to build military bases where they kill/torture others… not for roads, that is why we have states… the USFG gives money to states and states build roads to the USFG specifications. This makes the 50 states just a funding CP that avoids a DA with lesser solvency.

Boom, head shot.

Just like that Danny’s idea still kicks ass.
I vote Danny because being in poverty is shitty and because GW is bad, mmmkay! (G0D I love South Park!)

If you do run this, you would have to go with some sort of “warming inevitable but survivable” scenario. The obvious problem is that any impacts the case accesses are probably decades into the future, so you’re going to have a hard time winning the timeframe aspect of the impact debate.