Comments on: Structuring Topicality, Topicality Part 2 http://www.socal-ld.net/2008/01/30/structuring-topicality-topicality-part-2/ Southern California's NFA-LD site Fri, 23 Dec 2011 20:45:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Danny http://www.socal-ld.net/2008/01/30/structuring-topicality-topicality-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-792 Danny Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:12:59 +0000 http://www.socal-ld.net/?p=208#comment-792 You're right - I was wondering how that defined anything but figured it worked =) It's now fixed. You’re right – I was wondering how that defined anything but figured it worked =) It’s now fixed.

]]> By: Will Chamberlain http://www.socal-ld.net/2008/01/30/structuring-topicality-topicality-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-791 Will Chamberlain Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:23:14 +0000 http://www.socal-ld.net/?p=208#comment-791 Danny, The card you posted is a violation card and not a interpretation card. An interpretation would be an actual definition of increase from a dictionary of some sort. //WC ;-) Danny,

The card you posted is a violation card and not a interpretation card. An interpretation would be an actual definition of increase from a dictionary of some sort.

//WC ;-)

]]>